Syracuse earns No. 7 seed in Oklahoma City region, will play Creighton in first round

Posted on September 17, 2020Categories foxhpqlgTags , , , , , , , , , , ,   Leave a comment on Syracuse earns No. 7 seed in Oklahoma City region, will play Creighton in first round

first_img Published on March 18, 2013 at 8:00 pm Contact Kevin: kmprisei@syr.edu Unlike her senior teammates, Brittney Sykes hadn’t been through the NCAA tournament selection show experience of waiting to see if her team’s name would be called. Even if Syracuse didn’t make it this year, Sykes would still have three more chances to make it to the Big Dance.Still, that didn’t bring Sykes much comfort as the brackets were revealed.“I was as nervous as they were,” Sykes said. “I’m sitting next to Kayla (Alexander), each bracket that came up – Bridgeport and the Notre Dame bracket came up – and our name wasn’t called yet. I’m sitting there like, ‘Ugh, guys, I’m a little nervous.’”Sykes had nothing to worry about. Syracuse earned a No. 7 seed in this year’s NCAA tournament on Monday night. The Orange will face No. 10-seed Creighton in a first-round matchup Saturday in Knoxville, Tenn., at 11:20 a.m. The Syracuse-Creighton winner will face the winner of No. 2-seed Tennessee and No. 15-seed Oral Roberts on Monday.For Sykes and the rest of SU’s five-player freshman contingent, the tournament berth marked a quick reward for the beginning of a potentially prosperous Syracuse career. But the seniors – led by all-time leading scorer Alexander, along with career 1,000-point-scorers Carmen-Tyson Thomas and Elashier Hall – watched the show knowing this was their last chance to play in the NCAA tournament.AdvertisementThis is placeholder textSo when Syracuse’s seeding was announced, head coach Quentin Hillsman couldn’t help but feel pride for his seniors.“It’s awesome for them,” Hillsman said. “What else can they ask for? Just for themselves, to go on to life after college. They’ll all have an opportunity to play if they would like to play, but just to have that experience now, to have been in the NCAA tournament, is critical for them.”The team watched in a film room on the second floor of the Carmelo K. Anthony Basketball Center. As the first three regions were revealed, Syracuse’s name was not called. After a 24-7 season and third-place finish in Big East regular-season play, the Orange was a supposed lock this year.Still, for the seniors who have waited four years for this moment, seeing Syracuse’s name flash on the screen elicited positive emotions. With an NCAA tournament matchup approaching, the week ahead is sure to induce a special mood, Hall said.“None of us players have ever been in this situation, so we don’t really know what to expect,” Hall said. “Definitely another level of intensity, another level of excitement and competitiveness. We’re all excited to be here, in this position.”Six straight conference wins pushed SU’s record to 22-3 midway through February, but Syracuse lost three straight, the last a 77-75 triple-overtime loss to Villanova. The setback caused Hillsman and players to express concern that the team’s tournament berth wasn’t yet sealed, even as a top-five team in a conference that was ultimately awarded eight bids on Monday.But after beating Louisville on Senior Night for SU’s first win over a ranked team, those worries were put to rest.“We’re really relaxed right now,” Hillsman said. “We knew we were in the tournament about a week and a half, two weeks ago, so I think the stress was kind of off. It was just about us getting through the Big East tournament, winning some games and being healthy.”Hillsman said the team will run a normal morning practice Tuesday before beginning adjustments Wednesday in anticipation of the 789-mile trip to Knoxville.For Tyson-Thomas, the mood at practice will certainly be altered by the week’s anticipation, despite having won 10 Women’s National Invitation Tournament games in her career.“Ironically, it’s a different atmosphere,” Tyson-Thomas said. “We’re still going to be in the Carmelo Anthony Center, but it’s a different atmosphere. You know now that we’re going to something bigger, we’re in something different. We’ve got to bring a whole different level of play to the game, so I feel as though everything’s going to be a little tricked up.” Comments Facebook Twitter Google+last_img read more

Experimental Ebola drug saves monkeys, but will this translate to humans?

Posted on December 3, 2019Categories pdyqyhoqTags , , , , , , ,   Leave a comment on Experimental Ebola drug saves monkeys, but will this translate to humans?

first_imgSAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA—This past Wednesday, at a discussion titled “Stopping the Deadly Ebola Outbreak” held at the Scripps Research Institute here, a local TV reporter repeatedly prodded one of the star panelists, Kevin Whaley, the CEO of Mapp Biopharmaceutical of San Diego.After Whaley explained that he had no idea whether ZMapp, his company’s now famous experimental antibody cocktail used to treat Ebola victims, really worked, the journalist continued to press. “From what you’ve seen in your research—and what your heart says—what do you say?”The audience of 100 people or so broke into nervous giggles.Sign up for our daily newsletterGet more great content like this delivered right to you!Country *AfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBolivia, Plurinational State ofBonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCongo, The Democratic Republic of theCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Faroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and Mcdonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)HondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Democratic People’s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoMacedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorwayOmanPakistanPalestinianPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalQatarReunionRomaniaRussian FederationRWANDASaint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da CunhaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint Maarten (Dutch part)SlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwanTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofVietnamVirgin Islands, BritishWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweI also wish to receive emails from AAAS/Science and Science advertisers, including information on products, services and special offers which may include but are not limited to news, careers information & upcoming events.Required fields are included by an asterisk(*)“I’m not willing to speculate on that,” Whaley replied.The dogged reporter gave it one more try, referring to two American health workers who were infected with Ebola in Liberia, returned to the United States and received ZMapp, and lived to tell about it. “How happy were you to see the two missionaries walk out of the hospital?”“That was certainly very satisfying, and hopefully ZMapp played some role in that,” Whaley said. “But that remains to be seen.”The exchange highlights the growing hope that some biomedical intervention—such as a treatment like ZMapp—will allow more people to survive Ebola infections. Time and time again, however, hope and hype have become knotted together.Today, that knot is sure to grow tighter with the publication online in Nature of an encouraging monkey experiment with ZMapp, in which 100% of the infected monkeys survived. It is sure to further raise expectations of a cure—and further confuse the public about just how near a cure might be. Even the authors of the new study caution that extending the monkey results to humans could be a long and difficult task.The experiments, led by Gary Kobinger of the Public Health Agency of Canada in Winnipeg, first tested combinations of Ebola antibodies made by his lab and Mapp Bio to find a cocktail that worked best in guinea pigs and then monkeys. They selected the concoction now called ZMapp and gave it to three groups of six monkeys; all received intramuscular injections of high doses of Ebola virus. A control group of three monkeys were given dummy drugs.The treated monkeys each received a total of three doses of ZMapp, one every 3 days. Treatment began at 3 days postinfection for one group, at 4 days for another, and at 5 for a third. All 18 of the monkeys had evidence of infection, many became ill, and two nearly died.In the end, 100% of the treated monkeys survived, and 100% of the control animals quickly died. Although the experiment used an older Ebola virus that differs from the strain now in West Africa, the researchers showed in a test-tube study that ZMapp also worked against the more recently isolated virus.The results are “a monumental achievement,” wrote virologist Thomas Geisbert, who studies Ebola virus at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, in a Nature editorial accompanying the study.“It’s a great study,” Geisbert tells ScienceInsider. “I’ve got shelves and shelves and shelves of things that inhibit Ebola in cell culture and a small percent inhibit it in guinea pigs or mice. And I’ve got shelves and shelves of things that work in guinea pigs and mice but not in monkeys. If you save 100% of monkeys up to 5 days after infecting them, that’s a huge bar to clear.”In a teleconference held by Nature today, Kobinger said it was “quite remarkable” that they could rescue infected animals that had advanced disease, which he called “a very important step forward in the fight against Ebola virus.” But Kobinger also stressed that many unknowns remain about the differences between this monkey model and human infection.To begin with, most humans are infected by exposure to bodily fluids from people with Ebola, not by syringes that hold a huge bolus of virus injected into their muscles. This kills monkeys on average in 8 days, while it typically takes 3 to 21 days for humans to develop symptoms. “It’s very hard to translate” the disease progression in this monkey model to humans, Kobinger said. But a monkey infected by this route and left untreated for 5 days is 3 days away from death he said, which indicates that ZMapp worked well into the disease.The monkeys received three doses of ZMapp, and it sometimes required a second one before the level of Ebola virus in their blood—the viral load—dropped. With the seven treated humans, one person who died received only a single dose, and no one has yet reported how many doses the others received. Kobinger said he “would not expect” a single dose to work. “What the antibody is really doing is buying time,” said Kobinger, stressing the importance of proper medical care on survival.Kobinger said he had no idea whether the antibodies had any effect on viral load in these patients, as they were given the experimental ZMapp on a “compassionate use” basis. “When each of the clinicians or clinical teams that have been using ZMapp release their data, we’ll get a better sense of maybe the efficacy, but even then, it’s hard because it’s not really a designed study,” Kobinger said. “Unfortunately, it may be limited what we’re really going to learn from those seven patients.”In preliminary experiments not reported in the Nature paper, Korbinger said he has in vivo evidence that ZMapp works against the strain now circulating in West Africa. He said future experiments will analyze the impact of providing infected monkeys with effective intensive care. His group also wants to see how low of a dose of ZMapp they can give infected monkeys and still rescue them. “One of the things that is very urgent for us to do is a dose de-escalation study so that we can see what the minimum amount of antibody is so maybe with the same amount of material we could do more,” he said.The availability of ZMapp is a critical issue for the growing number of people who want access to it on a compassionate use basis. Mapp Bio says it now has no more ZMapp on hand. Kentucky BioProcessing in Owensboro grows the ZMapp antibodies in tobacco plants. In a 2012 press release, that company’s chief operating officer, Barry Bratcher, said it had a fully automated production system “that operates in accordance with good manufacturing practices” and could “generate a new antibody lot in two weeks to rapidly address new threats and new outbreaks.” Bratcher did not reply to an e-mail from ScienceInsider to discuss that prediction.At the Scripps panel talk, Whaley told ScienceInsider that they were still trying to sort out production issues. “Clearly we misstated [the production time needed],” Whaley said. “That clearly was not our intention.”Questions also have been raised about how it was decided to give ZMapp to the seven people who have received ZMapp so far, two of whom were from Europe and two from the United States. Whaley said the company responds to requests that come through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and has no say in who ultimately had received the product.Two of the seven ZMapp patients have died. Their outcomes ultimately say nothing about the treatment: The people received the drug at different stages of disease, and four were evacuated to wealthy countries for top-notch care—likely the most important determinant of survival. No information has become public about the effect the antibodies had on their levels of virus. What’s more, it’s an experiment without a control. “These people did not have an identical twin who was infected the same day and didn’t get treated,” said Scripps structural biologist Erica Ollmann Saphire, who was a panelist at the event there and helped Mapp Bio select antibodies. “That’s why we need to do the human clinical trial.”Human studies of ZMapp are scheduled to begin in early 2015.Meanwhile, Ebola cases continue to rise. The World Health Organization as of yesterday reported 3069 cases and 1552 deaths, a case fatality rate of 52%. Senegal today reported its first case.*The Ebola Files: Given the current Ebola outbreak, unprecedented in terms of number of people killed and rapid geographic spread, Science and Science Translational Medicine have made a collection of research and news articles on the viral disease freely available to researchers and the general public.last_img read more